Accounting · Xero · Buyer’s guide

Construction software for Xero,
eleven products compared on the sync.

Most Australian builders already run Xero and are not leaving it, so the real question is what sits on top and how well the two are joined. Eleven platforms, what each integration actually syncs and in which direction, taken from vendor documentation and Xero App Store listings rather than from the word seamless.

01 / Verdict

Which construction software actually works with Xero

Most Australian builders keep Xero and add a construction layer on top. Buildxact, Buildern, BuildLogic, Nexvia, Simpro, Wunderbuild and VIABUILD all sync two ways with Xero. Buildertrend syncs two ways for some data but is built around US sales tax. ClickHome and Databuild do not integrate with Xero at all: Databuild is the ledger. Choose on which objects sync and whether tracking categories are applied, not on the badge.

  • Best documented sync: Buildxact, from $199 a month excluding GST with unlimited users; you choose the direction per object and up to two tracking categories are applied.
  • Widest object list: Nexvia and BuildLogic, neither of which publishes pricing.
  • Cheapest way in for one or two jobs: Wunderbuild, from $123 a month including GST, two-way on invoices, contacts, quotes, tracking categories and purchase orders.
  • Residential builders who want the build run beside Xero: VIABUILD, $555 a month including GST for three users, native two-way on bills, claims, variations and contacts with tracking categories applied. We publish this page.
  • No Xero at all: ClickHome and Databuild.

Checked 7 September 2026 against each vendor’s own documentation or Xero App Store listing. Prices as published by the vendor, in the vendor’s tax wording.

02 / The criteria

What a real Xero integration has to do

Six things, all checkable in a demo, and all of them things a marketing page can claim without doing. Read these before the table, because they are what the table is scoring.

Two-way, and specific about which way

One-way push is not a sync, and “two-way” on its own is not an answer. Every integration on this page moves different objects in different directions, and the good ones publish the list. Ask for the object-by-object list in writing before you connect anything.

Bills and claims treated as different things

Cost flows one way, revenue the other. Approved supplier bills should reach Xero as bills, and approved progress claims should reach it as sales invoices. A connector that only handles cost leaves the revenue side being typed twice, which is usually the half you notice at BAS time.

Tracking categories applied on the way through

Job-level reporting in Xero depends on tracking categories, and they only help if something applies them consistently. A system that pushes bills without setting the category has moved the coding problem rather than solved it. Confirm which category is applied and whether you control the mapping.

GST handled once, with a stated mapping

The tax treatment on a line has to be the same in both systems or your BAS becomes a reconciliation exercise. Ask how GST codes map, what a mixed-treatment invoice does, and where rounding happens. Products built around US sales tax need this asked harder, not skipped.

Contacts that stay one list

Suppliers and subcontractors exist in both systems the moment you connect. Maintained separately, you get duplicates, near-duplicates and bills coded to the wrong entity. Ask how contacts are matched on first connection and what happens when a new supplier is created on either side.

A stated rule about which system owns what

Two-way does not mean everything is editable everywhere. Good integrations state plainly which system is authoritative for each object and what happens when something changes on the other side. Vagueness here is where month-end reconciliation work gets created.

Every integration statement on this page comes from that vendor’s own documentation or its Xero App Store listing, checked on 7 September 2026. Where a vendor documents nothing, the cell says so plainly rather than filling the gap with a guess, and “integrates with Xero” on a home page is not treated as evidence of anything. Where we found no integration, the wording is “none found”, which is not the same as saying none exists. Vendors change their products; confirm current behaviour directly before you connect a live organisation.

03 / The arrangement

Why you keep Xero and add a layer

Worth two minutes before the comparison, because it decides which of these products is even answering your question.

What Xero does well

The general ledger, bank feeds, payroll, GST and BAS. As the accounting system of record for a residential building business it does this job well, and it is the system your accountant and bookkeeper already know how to use.

Job costing against a budget

A ledger records what was spent by account. It does not natively hold a per-job budget by cost code and compare budget to actual line by line as the job runs. Tracking categories approximate a job total, not a structured budget-versus-actual.

Committed cost

The ledger records a cost when the bill arrives. A builder commits the money when the purchase order is raised or the subcontract is let, often weeks earlier. Committed cost is the earliest true signal a job is heading over, and it lives outside the ledger entirely.

Work in progress and retentions

On a job billed in stages, cash in and work done rarely line up. Over and under-billing, earned revenue, retention held and released, and cost to complete are construction calculations a general ledger does not perform on its own.

The problem builders have is not that Xero is bad at accounting. It is that accounting is not job cost control, and the two are different shapes. Xero holds the ledger; the construction system holds the budget, the committed cost, the claims and the schedule. An integration joins them so a bill is entered once. The alternative arrangement, replacing the ledger with a construction ERP, is a real option at volume and it is what Databuild and ClickHome assume, but it means retraining whoever does your books and migrating history, which is a conversation with your accountant rather than a software comparison.

04 / Side by side

Construction management software with Xero integration compared

Eleven products, the same seven questions: integration type, which objects move, whether MYOB is an option, best fit, published entry price and country of origin. On a phone, scroll the table sideways.

Construction software compared on Xero integration, eleven products across integration type, objects synced, MYOB support, best fit, entry price and country of origin
VendorXero integrationWhat syncsMYOB tooBest forPrice fromAustralian-built
BuildLogicTwo-wayInvoices, contacts and tracking categories both ways. Timesheets out to Xero. Pay runs, accounts, tax rates, receipts, payments, journals, employees and credit notes in from Xero.Not namedContractors running mixed work who want the ledger fed automaticallyNot publishedYes. Brisbane
BuildxactTwo-wayPurchase orders out as Xero bills, customer invoices out as sales, Xero bills back in as imported bills, contacts both ways. Up to two tracking categories applied.Yes. MYOB AccountRight and QuickBooks OnlineSole traders and small builders whose real problem is quotingFrom $199/mo ex GST, unlimited usersYes. Australian-founded
NexviaTwo-way (vendor states two-way; listing does not use the term)Bills, invoices, contractor and client credit notes, contacts, tax rates, employees, rates of pay, Xero tracking categories, timesheets, multiple Xero organisations.Yes. MYOB and QuickBooksBusinesses spanning fitout, production and specialty or commercial tradesNot publishedYes. Australia and New Zealand
VIABUILDTwo-way, nativeApproved supplier bills out to Xero as drafts with tracking categories applied. Approved progress claims and variations out as invoices. Contacts kept aligned.No. Xero onlyAustralian residential builders who want the build run alongside Xero$555/mo inc GST, 3 users, extra users $65/moYes
WunderbuildTwo-wayInvoices, contacts, quotes, tracking categories and purchase orders both ways. Accounts and credit notes in from Xero.Not namedBuilders running one or two jobs who want everyone in the systemFrom $123/mo incl GST, 1 active project, unlimited usersYes. Melbourne
BuildernTwo-wayBills and invoices created in Buildern push to Xero and updates in Xero reflect back. Projects map to Xero customers, cost codes to products and services, subs and vendors to suppliers.No. QuickBooksBuilders whose pain is chasing subbies and updating clientsFrom US$250/mo for 2 seatsNo. Prices in US dollars
BuildertrendTwo-way “for certain information”, in the vendor’s own wordsContacts from jobs, invoices, subs, vendors and bills out to Xero. Financial data comes back. Cost codes must be linked to Xero products and services, and jobs to Xero contacts.Not namedResidential builders and remodellers who need client-facing depthNot published. Custom quoteNo. United States
SimproTwo-wayTwo-way: customer, supplier and contractor contacts, invoices, credits, supplier invoices, payments, tax rates. One-way out: timesheets, inventory and manual journals, accounts and tracking categories.Not named on its Xero listing. Confirm with the vendorService and maintenance trades rather than project home buildingNot published. “Request pricing”Yes. Brisbane
Evolve ConstructionNamed by the vendor. Direction not documented publiclyNo object list published. The one integration here you cannot check before a sales call.Yes, namedVolume home builders wanting automation across a large pipelineNot published. “A pricing model that only kicks in when each job starts”Yes
ClickHomeNone foundFinance and ERP integrations named are Databuild, Beams, BusinessCraft, Constructor and Utecture. Xero is not among them.Not namedVolume and project home builders already running a construction ERPFrom $225 a job (entry tier)Yes. Hosted in Australia
DatabuildNone found. Databuild is the ledgerNo Xero integration documented. Import and export via XML, CSV and other ASCII routines.Not applicable. Accounting is built inBuilders who want estimating, job costing and accounting in one systemNot publishedYes. Around 40 years in the Australian market

Checked 7 September 2026 against each vendor’s own documentation and, where one exists, its Xero App Store listing. Prices are as published by the vendor, in the currency the vendor publishes. Integration behaviour changes between versions and regions, so confirm the objects you depend on directly with the vendor before you commit.

05 / The field

The eleven, one at a time

Grouped by how deep the integration actually goes and alphabetical inside each group, not ranked. Who each one suits, what its Xero sync mechanically does, and one honest limitation.

01 / Two-way, tracking categories documented

BuildLogic

Brisbane-based, with offices in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth, and positioned across a wide contractor field: civil, roofing, remedial, HVAC, electrical, concreting and both commercial and residential. If you run genuinely mixed work rather than one job type, that breadth is useful rather than diluted.

What the Xero integration actually does. The widest object list on this page. Invoices, contacts and tracking categories move in both directions. Timesheets go out to Xero. Pay runs, accounts, tax rates, receipts, payments, journals, employees and credit notes come back in. BuildLogic’s own page describes automatic syncs running several times through the day with a manual sync available, and frames it as sending invoices, timesheets and purchase orders across “and back again”.

The honest limitation. It publishes no pricing, so comparing the total cost means a sales call, and MYOB is not named anywhere as an alternative ledger. The breadth that makes it useful across trades also means the residential money trail, fixed-price contracts, claims against contract stages, client selections, is one configuration among many rather than the spine of the product.

02 / Two-way, tracking categories documented

Buildxact

The most common starting point for an Australian sole trader or small builder whose real problem is quoting. Estimating and takeoff are the core, job management sits on top, and every tier includes unlimited users, so putting the whole team in does not raise the bill.

What the Xero integration actually does. The best-documented integration here, and the only one whose direction you choose per object during setup. Purchase orders push to Xero as bills, customer invoices push as sales, and bills raised in Xero come back as imported bills. Contacts sync both ways, with defined behaviour for creating, linking and relinking. Up to two Xero tracking categories are applied, typically job ID and a costing category, which is what makes job-level reporting work in the ledger. Syncs trigger on a purchase order marked part received or received and on an invoice marked invoiced, or on a manual push.

The honest limitation. The integration is strong; the product around it is estimating-led. If your week is being eaten by supplier invoices, progress claims and not knowing where a job sits financially, the sync will move that work to Xero faster without reducing it. The VIABUILD and Buildxact comparison takes it dimension by dimension.

03 / Two-way, tracking categories documented

Nexvia

Australian and New Zealand, aimed at residential, fitout, manufacturing and production, and specialty or commercial trades. Tendering is treated as a first-class part of the workflow, which most residential products do not bother with.

What the Xero integration actually does. The longest synced-object list of any listing we read, and the only one that names support for multiple Xero organisations, which matters if you run more than one entity. Bills, invoices, contractor and client credit notes, contacts, tax rates, employees, rates of pay, tracking categories and timesheets. Nexvia’s own material describes two-way syncing with Xero, MYOB and QuickBooks; the App Store listing itself lists the objects without using the words one-way or two-way, so confirm the direction of the ones you care about.

The honest limitation. No published pricing, so it cannot be compared on cost without a call. And spanning four segments means the residential workflow is one configuration among several. If you tender competitively across mixed job types that breadth is the point; if you build houses on fixed-price contracts it is weight you carry.

04 / Two-way, tracking categories documented

VIABUILD

We publish this page, so read this entry with that in mind and make us prove it in a trial. VIABUILD is for Australian residential builders, project and custom, who want the build run in one connected system while Xero stays the ledger, and who would rather pay one platform price than assemble a stack.

What the Xero integration actually does. Native and two-way, and deliberately narrow on the cost and revenue trail rather than broad across every Xero object. Approved supplier bills push across as draft bills with tracking categories applied, so cost lands against the right job in your accounts rather than as a lump. Approved progress claims and variations push as Xero invoices. Contacts stay aligned across the two systems. Because the same coded actuals also feed cost tracking, budget against committed against actual stays current as bills land. The full object list is on the Xero integration page.

The honest limitation. The accounting integration is Xero only. There is no MYOB integration today, so if your ledger lives in MYOB the honest answer is that Buildxact, Nexvia or Evolve are the ones to look at rather than a roadmap promise from us. We are also early to market compared with most of this list.

05 / Two-way, tracking categories documented

Wunderbuild

Melbourne-built, and priced by the number of active projects rather than by seats: from $123 a month including GST for one active project, rising to $499 for unlimited, with unlimited users on every tier and no lock-in. For a builder running one or two jobs who wants the whole team inside the system, that is a cheap way in.

What the Xero integration actually does. Invoices, contacts, quotes, tracking categories and purchase orders move in both directions, with accounts and credit notes coming in from Xero. The listing describes synchronising purchase orders, expenses, progress claims and contacts. Progress claims reaching Xero matters more than it sounds: a connector that only handles cost leaves the revenue side being typed twice.

The honest limitation. Oddly, Wunderbuild names no accounting integration at all on its own features or pricing pages. The detail above comes from its Xero App Store listing. That is a marketing gap rather than a product one, but it means a builder evaluating from the website alone would never know the integration exists, and it is worth confirming the current object list directly.

06 / Two-way, tracking categories not documented

Buildern

An international platform with a commercial idea that fits a real problem: external users, field workers, subcontractors, suppliers and clients, are unlimited and free, and you pay only for internal seats.

What the Xero integration actually does. A genuinely two-way sync with an unusual mapping. Projects map to Xero customers, cost codes map to Xero products and services, and subs and vendors map to suppliers. Once that is aligned, bills and invoices raised in Buildern push automatically to Xero, and changes made in Xero come back. Note what that mapping implies: job-level reporting comes from the customer record rather than from tracking categories, which is a different shape from most of this list and worth understanding before you commit a chart of accounts to it.

The honest limitation. Tracking categories are not documented on the listing, and it prices in US dollars. Progress claims tied to contract stages, GST and BAS are things you configure toward rather than things the product assumes. Test that on your own contract and your own claim schedule.

07 / Two-way, tracking categories not documented

Buildertrend

The largest residential construction platform by installed base, built in the United States for homebuilders and remodellers, and strongest on the client-facing side: selections, warranties, client communication and the sales pipeline.

What the Xero integration actually does. Buildertrend is more careful in its own words than most third-party articles are on its behalf. Asked whether the sync is two-way, its Xero page answers: “Yes, there is two-way sync for certain information. Some data including contacts from jobs, invoices, subs, vendors and bills can transfer automatically from Buildertrend to Xero. Additionally, financial data comes back to Buildertrend from Xero.” Setup requires linking cost codes to Xero products and services and jobs to Xero contacts. Note the hedges, “certain information” and “some data”, and ask which objects apply to you.

The honest limitation. The integration is described in United States terms. Buildertrend’s own overview of it lists “calculate sales tax for transactions”, and sales tax is not GST. It says nothing about tracking categories or BAS. None of that means it cannot work for an Australian builder, but it does mean GST treatment and the BAS path are the first two things to test on a connected trial organisation rather than assume.

08 / Two-way, tracking categories not documented

Simpro

Australian, and built for field service and maintenance work: quoting, technician scheduling, inventory, recurring maintenance and fleet. Simpro pitches itself at businesses from five to 200 staff. If you run service and maintenance alongside projects, it covers ground the residential products on this page do not.

What the Xero integration actually does. Its listing is the most explicit about direction, which is a good sign. Two-way for customer, supplier and contractor contacts, invoices and credits, supplier invoices, payments, tax rates and credit notes. One-way from Simpro to Xero for timesheets, inventory journals, manual journals, accounts and tracking categories. That last one matters: tracking categories are pushed out, not synchronised, so Xero is downstream of Simpro on job coding rather than a peer.

The honest limitation. It is not residential construction software. Progress claims against contract stages, variations, client selections and retention are not the problems it was built for, and a builder buying it for a fixed-price housing contract will be configuring around the grain all the way. Pricing is quote-only.

09 / Xero named, depth not documented

Evolve Construction

Australian, and aimed at volume residential builders: end to end from sales through to post-handover maintenance, with AI-assisted accounts payable, vendor compliance and real-time variation tracking. If you run a large pipeline of homes, this is a serious contender.

What the Xero integration actually does. Unknown in detail, and we will not guess. Evolve names its integrations plainly, “Xero, MYOB, Microsoft Dynamics, Framework, Databuild, Constructive, Salesforce, LinkSafe, and more”, but publishes no object list, no direction and no Xero App Store listing we could find. That is not a criticism of the integration, which may well be excellent. It means the object-by-object question in the verification section below is the whole conversation for this one.

The honest limitation. Nothing about the integration is publicly checkable, and pricing is not published either. Both are answerable in a sales conversation, but it does mean Evolve cannot be shortlisted from a desk the way most of this list can.

10 / No Xero integration found

ClickHome

The one to beat if you build homes at volume. ClickHome segments its own market at 20 to 200 homes a year and 200-plus, and describes itself as the dominant choice among Australia’s HIA Top 20 builders.

What the Xero integration actually does. None that we could find, and this is the single most useful fact on the page for a builder who assumed otherwise. ClickHome’s own integrations page lists its finance and ERP connections as Databuild, Beams, BusinessCraft, Constructor and Utecture. Xero is not among them, and neither is MYOB. Those five are construction ERPs, which tells you the shape of the customer it expects: a volume builder whose ledger is already a construction-specific system, not Xero.

The honest limitation. If you build at volume and you intend to stay on Xero, this is the wrong product, and no amount of feature comparison changes that. If you are large enough that moving off Xero to a construction ERP is on the table anyway, it belongs on your shortlist and this page is not the right one to be reading.

11 / No Xero integration found

Databuild

Australian builders who want estimating, job costing and accounting in one system rather than a construction product bolted onto a separate ledger. Around forty years in Australian building offices, with accounting, job cost reporting and payroll integration inside the product.

What the Xero integration actually does. There is no Xero integration to describe, and that is by design rather than by omission. Databuild describes itself as “a complete estimating and accounting system”. It is the ledger. Data moves via what it calls sophisticated import and export routines using XML, CSV and other ASCII formats, which is a file transfer, not a sync. Tellingly, both ClickHome and Evolve list Databuild as a finance system they integrate with.

The honest limitation. If you are searching for construction software that works with Xero, Databuild is answering a different question: replace Xero rather than sit on top of it. That is a legitimate choice with a real cost, retraining whoever does your books and migrating history. The VIABUILD and Databuild comparison covers what happens to a price book and years of job history in a move.

06 / By name

Buildertrend and Xero: what actually syncs

Buildertrend states two-way sync “for certain information”. This is the full extent of what its own Xero page documents, object by object, so you can see the hedges rather than read past them.

Buildertrend and Xero sync direction by object, from the vendor’s own documentation
ObjectDirectionWhat the vendor documents
Contacts from jobsBuildertrend to XeroNamed in the vendor’s FAQ as data that “can transfer automatically from Buildertrend to Xero”. Jobs must be linked to Xero contacts during setup.
Invoices (client)Buildertrend to XeroNamed in the same FAQ answer. The vendor does not document the Xero document type they arrive as.
Subs, vendors and billsBuildertrend to XeroNamed in the same FAQ answer. Cost codes must be linked to Xero products and services first, so job coding relies on that mapping.
Financial dataXero to Buildertrend“Financial data comes back to Buildertrend from Xero”, in the vendor’s words. Which objects that covers is not itemised.
Tracking categoriesNot documentedNot mentioned on the vendor’s Xero page. Ask before you assume job-level reporting in Xero.
Tax treatmentDescribed as sales taxThe overview lists “calculate sales tax for transactions”. GST and BAS are not mentioned, so test one mixed-treatment invoice on a trial organisation.

Source: Buildertrend’s Xero integration page, read on 7 September 2026. Buildertrend does not publish pricing, so the cost of the platform behind this integration is a quote. The practical reading is that cost flows out and the ledger position flows back, with GST and tracking categories the two things to test before you connect a live organisation.

07 / By name

Buildxact and Xero: what actually syncs

The best documented integration on this page, and the only one where you choose the direction per object during setup. From $199 a month excluding GST on the Foundation tier, with unlimited users.

Buildxact and Xero sync direction by object, from the vendor’s own help documentation
ObjectDirectionWhat the vendor documents
Purchase ordersBuildxact to Xero, as billsPushed when the order is marked part received or received, or on a manual sync.
Customer invoicesBuildxact to Xero, as sales invoicesPushed when the invoice is marked invoiced or received, or on a manual sync.
Bills raised in XeroXero to Buildxact, as imported billsThe direction you prefer per object is chosen during setup, which no other integration here documents.
ContactsBoth waysCreate, link and relink behaviour is documented, so duplicates are a setup decision rather than a surprise.
Tracking categoriesApplied on the way to XeroUp to two Xero tracking categories, typically job ID and a costing category, which is what makes job-level reporting work in the ledger.
Progress claimsAs customer invoicesBuildxact’s documentation describes customer invoices rather than claims as a separate object; confirm how a staged claim lands.

Source: Buildxact’s help article on the Xero integration and its Australian pricing page, read on 7 September 2026. Buildxact also connects to MYOB AccountRight and QuickBooks Online, which is the widest ledger choice on this page. The VIABUILD and Buildxact comparison puts the two Xero syncs side by side with the rest of each product.

08 / Verify it yourself

How to check an integration before you buy

Everything above was read off a vendor page. These six steps are how you find out what is actually true for your file, your contracts and your bookkeeper.

  1. 01

    Do not take an app store listing as the answer

    A listing tells you a connection exists. It does not tell you which objects move, in which direction, or whether tracking categories are applied. Integrations range from a nightly one-way export of totals to a native two-way sync of individual bills with job coding applied, and every one of them can be described with the same words. Two vendors on this page document more in their listing than on their own website, and one documents nothing anywhere.

  2. 02

    Ask for the object list, in writing

    Contacts, bills, sales invoices, payments, credit notes, tracking categories, chart of accounts. Which of those move, in which direction, and what triggers the move: approval, a schedule, or a manual push. A vendor who answers this crisply has built an integration. A vendor who answers with the word seamless has built a badge.

  3. 03

    Watch a bill and a claim go across, live

    On a connected test organisation, in the demo, watch a supplier bill land in Xero with the tracking category on it, and watch an approved progress claim land as a sales invoice. This takes four minutes and it is the single most informative thing you can ask for in the whole evaluation.

  4. 04

    Run one real GST case, not a clean one

    Take an invoice with mixed GST treatment, the kind that actually turns up, and follow it all the way into the ledger. This is where products built around US sales tax show themselves, and it is a five-minute test that saves a quarter of arguing at BAS time.

  5. 05

    Bring your bookkeeper to the demo

    They will find the friction before you do. Where do they code bills now, where will they code them after, and which of their existing month-end steps disappears. If nothing about their week changes, nothing about your double entry has changed either.

  6. 06

    Ask what disconnection does

    Whether historic bills and invoices are imported, ignored or duplicated on connection, and whether you can trial on a test organisation first. Then ask what happens when you unplug it. You want to know you can leave and find Xero intact and correct.

09 / The decision

Which one should you choose

Segment by segment, with the three where we are not the answer stated as plainly as the one where we are.

Volume or project home builder

Evolve Construction or Nexvia if Xero stays the ledger, though Evolve publishes nothing about its integration so that is a sales conversation. ClickHome is the strongest volume product here but does not connect to Xero at all, so it is only the answer if you are willing to move to a construction ERP.

Boutique or custom residential builder

This is our segment and we will say so plainly: VIABUILD, for one connected system with a native two-way Xero sync on the bill and claim trail. Buildxact if estimating is genuinely the whole problem and you want the deepest documented sync on this page.

Sole trader or small renovator

Buildxact or Wunderbuild, not us. Buildxact has the better-documented integration and covers MYOB and QuickBooks as well. Wunderbuild is cheaper if you run one or two jobs. A full operating system is overhead at this size and paying for one before the admin hurts is a common, expensive mistake.

Commercial mid-tier, service and maintenance

Nexvia or BuildLogic for commercial and mixed trades, both with wide two-way syncs and neither of them us. Simpro if the work is service and maintenance rather than projects. Residential construction software configured toward commercial work is a worse answer than a product built for it.

If you are torn between two, the tiebreaker is not the object list, it is your own paperwork. Connect both to a Xero trial organisation and push one real bill and one real claim through each. Our own side of this is on the Xero integration page, and if AI in the workflow is also part of the decision, the AI construction software comparison covers a wider field on that question. If takeoff is what decides it, what estimating actually involves is the better starting point.

10 / FAQ

Common questions.

Yes, with a caveat worth reading. Buildertrend states two-way sync “for certain information”: contacts from jobs, invoices, subs, vendors and bills go out, and financial data comes back. Cost codes must be linked to Xero products and services. Its own overview describes sales tax rather than GST, so test GST first.

Yes, and it is the best-documented integration on this page. Purchase orders push to Xero as bills, customer invoices push as sales, Xero bills come back in, and contacts sync both ways. Up to two Xero tracking categories are applied, which is what makes job-level reporting work in the ledger.

For most Australian residential builders, yes, and keeping it is the cheaper answer. Xero handles the ledger, bank feeds, payroll, GST and BAS, and your accountant already works in it. The construction system holds job budgets, committed cost, claims and retentions, which a general ledger has no concept of.

On documented object lists, Nexvia and BuildLogic sync the widest range, and Buildxact documents direction and triggers most precisely. Depth is not the same as fit, though. A wide sync into a product built for the wrong kind of work still leaves you configuring around the grain every day.

It depends entirely on whether the product was built here. An approved claim should reach Xero as a sales invoice with GST already correct, so the BAS needs no reconciliation. Take one mixed-treatment invoice through a trial connection and watch what arrives, rather than accepting an answer in a demo.

Neither, as far as their own documentation shows. ClickHome names Databuild, Beams, BusinessCraft, Constructor and Utecture as its finance integrations, and Xero is not among them. Databuild is itself a complete estimating and accounting system, so it replaces the ledger rather than connecting to it.

No, and this is the most common misreading in the category. A listing proves a connection exists, nothing more. Ask for the object-by-object list with directions, then watch a bill and a claim actually cross on a connected test organisation. Four minutes of demonstration beats any amount of integration copy.

11 / Keep reading

Before you connect your organisation

How our own Xero integration works, the accounting background, and the named head-to-head comparisons.

Push a real bill through and watch.

VIABUILD runs the build and Xero stays your ledger. Connect a trial organisation, approve one supplier bill and one progress claim, and see where they land and how they are coded. That is the whole evaluation.